<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Idea &#8211; Talk About It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harbott.com/2009/03/08/the-idea-talk-about-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harbott.com/2009/03/08/the-idea-talk-about-it/</link>
	<description>Behind the scenes, following the  code, business, design, marketing and inspiration of a CTO in a software company.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:51:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.harbott.com/2009/03/08/the-idea-talk-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harbott.com/?p=41#comment-14</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a great idea...if built correctly could be &#039;revolutionary&#039;.

I do have concerns though about the variety of requirements for small businesses. Some need complex accounting, eCommerce requirements for their sector, operations/logistics function particular for their sector etc.

If this was started in one market and then migrated to others (similar to the way SAP started - after all this would be effectively a small business ERP) then it may work. A &#039;general&#039; release which is not sector specific may leave it falling between all the cracks.

Good luck!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a great idea&#8230;if built correctly could be &#8216;revolutionary&#8217;.</p>
<p>I do have concerns though about the variety of requirements for small businesses. Some need complex accounting, eCommerce requirements for their sector, operations/logistics function particular for their sector etc.</p>
<p>If this was started in one market and then migrated to others (similar to the way SAP started &#8211; after all this would be effectively a small business ERP) then it may work. A &#8216;general&#8217; release which is not sector specific may leave it falling between all the cracks.</p>
<p>Good luck!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arif</title>
		<link>http://www.harbott.com/2009/03/08/the-idea-talk-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Arif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harbott.com/?p=41#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Yes definitely modular, some of the modules we have thought about are: finance/ bookkeeping, operations, CRM, reporting, marketing. All the tools to run a small business in one place, simple tools these are not for enterprises with complicated operations. When you start a business there is a lot to think about, and having all your tools in one place is one less thing to think about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes definitely modular, some of the modules we have thought about are: finance/ bookkeeping, operations, CRM, reporting, marketing. All the tools to run a small business in one place, simple tools these are not for enterprises with complicated operations. When you start a business there is a lot to think about, and having all your tools in one place is one less thing to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.harbott.com/2009/03/08/the-idea-talk-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harbott.com/?p=41#comment-12</guid>
		<description>What would you consider to be the essential functions for the suite? Would it be modular so small businesses could choose the features they required?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would you consider to be the essential functions for the suite? Would it be modular so small businesses could choose the features they required?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arif</title>
		<link>http://www.harbott.com/2009/03/08/the-idea-talk-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Arif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harbott.com/?p=41#comment-11</guid>
		<description>That is something we looked at but could not find a suite of solutions that solved our needs. However that is something we will consider for some parts of the app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is something we looked at but could not find a suite of solutions that solved our needs. However that is something we will consider for some parts of the app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.harbott.com/2009/03/08/the-idea-talk-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harbott.com/?p=41#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Would it be better to build clever communication links to these already competent applications...or to start from scratch and rebuild? Many companies have built very successful businesses by creating middleware that is never seen. The clever middleware acts as messenger between applications allow you to feed data from one to the other with ease in real-time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be better to build clever communication links to these already competent applications&#8230;or to start from scratch and rebuild? Many companies have built very successful businesses by creating middleware that is never seen. The clever middleware acts as messenger between applications allow you to feed data from one to the other with ease in real-time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arif</title>
		<link>http://www.harbott.com/2009/03/08/the-idea-talk-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Arif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harbott.com/?p=41#comment-9</guid>
		<description>What I was trying to say that the idea my is not revolutionary, it is simply an amalgamation of lots of ideas that are already out there.
I think if you wait for the revolutionary ideas, most times you will be waiting forever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I was trying to say that the idea my is not revolutionary, it is simply an amalgamation of lots of ideas that are already out there.<br />
I think if you wait for the revolutionary ideas, most times you will be waiting forever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.harbott.com/2009/03/08/the-idea-talk-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harbott.com/?p=41#comment-8</guid>
		<description>&quot;...Nothing revolutionary but it will be a one stop shop for small business owners...&quot;

What would be the revolutionary part...or is that secret squirrel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Nothing revolutionary but it will be a one stop shop for small business owners&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>What would be the revolutionary part&#8230;or is that secret squirrel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

