Posts Tagged ‘strategy’

Focus, focus, focus and then focus some more

Wednesday, March 30th, 2011

One of the first business books I ever read was “Focus” by Al Ries and it really made an impact on me. I recently came across a quote from Twitter founder Ev Williams that again brought up the concept of focusing:

“Focus on the smallest possible problem you could solve that would potentially be useful. Most companies start out trying to do too many things, which makes life difficult and turns you into a me-too. Focusing on a small niche has so many advantages: With much less work, you can be the best at what you do. Small things, like a microscopic world, almost always turn out to be bigger than you think when you zoom in. You can much more easily position and market yourself when more focused. And when it comes to partnering, or being acquired, there’s less chance for conflict. This is all so logical and, yet, there’s a resistance to focusing. I think it comes from a fear of being trivial. Just remember: If you get to be #1 in your category, but your category is too small, then you can broaden your scope—and you can do so with leverage.”

People tend to find focusing hard in a fast moving, multi device always on world (myself included). A lot of entrepreneurs seem to think that when they want to raise investment they need to have an all signing all dancing product. As you approach your go live date there is a tendency to just add another feature and another until you have a product that does not fit the needs of your market. It is not cool or sexy to focus but it is a powerful concept that you ignore at your peril.

I think the idea of focusing your product has the following benefits:

  • It makes development easier if you focus only key features
  • It helps with positioning and can help you stand out from the crowd
  • It makes targeting customers easier
  • The whole concept of MVP demands that you focus on the smallest number of features possible to get your product released

Strategic analysis and recommendations for Krispy Kreme

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

For our strategy coursework we had to find a solution to a particular strategic challenge faced by a firm of our choice. It was by far the hardest coursework we have done so far because it was so open ended.

We made some mistakes along the way:

  • Choosing a strategic issue that was too big
  • Choosing a market that was too wide
  • Picking companies that had too many business units and divisions

After a few false starts we chose Krispy Kreme as it has a simple product line, clear value proposition and an interesting history.

You can download the whole report here: Krispy Kreme Strategic Analysis

What is the difference between strategy, business model and tactics?

Tuesday, February 8th, 2011

It’s not easy to explain eloquently the difference between your strategy, business model and tactics, but I heard a really great car analogy recently that explained it perfectly:

A strategy is like being a car designer, your business model is the car and your tactics are the car driver.

Business model innovation in emerging economies

Tuesday, February 1st, 2011

I listened to a talk recently from a senior strategy executive at one of the World’s largest companies. In his talk he lamented that as a firm they were struggling to tap the Chinese and Indian emerging economies and that local competitors were beating them hands down. When we quizzed him about the strategy for emerging countries he said that they sold the same products as they did in the rest of the World but at a cheaper price.

Re-think your business model for emerging economies

Simply selling your existing products cheaper in emerging economies is not enough, you need to re-think your business model from the ground up based on region and local needs. Products should solve problems and you cannot assume that a villager in India has the same problems as a person living in the centre of New York.

See the local problems first hand

I recently read an article describing how a company selling fridges entered the Indian market with disastrous sales. They want back to the drawing board and re-engineered the product and process from the ground up:

They sent out teams of people to live with typical families in India to see first hand what problems they were experiencing, and they found something really interesting.

  • The families were highly mobile (moving house often)
  • They bought fresh foods almost everyday, so they used their fridge to store the evening meal so that it would last until the next day
  • They only needed to chill their foods they did not require high powered refrigeration for creating ice or freezing food
  • They had constant power cuts so they only kept small amounts of food refrigerated

Re-engineer your product

With these insights the company designed a small, lightweight fridge (which could be easily transported) with minimal cooling (which meant cheaper manufacturing) with backup battery power (in case of power failure). With the reduced parts and size the company could sell the new product at $69 which was almost 8 times cheaper than the original price.

Start with your customer value proposition

Once you have your customer value proposition you can decide whether you want to choose a cost leadership model over the differentiation model and then you need to understand the antecedents of these two approaches and build your local infrastructure to support them.

Porter’s five forces industry analysis for Krispy Kreme

Saturday, January 29th, 2011

What is Porter’s Five Forces? Well I doubt there is any need to explain one of the most famous strategic tools around but just in case, it is a tool to analyse the external industry to find the root causes of profitability.

Again seeing an example is useful and below is a five forces analysis of Krispy Kreme.

Rivalry among existing competitors (High +++)

  • High concentration of rivals e.g. Starbucks and local chains
  • Static market growth
  • High fixed costs
  • Perishable products (food and drink)

A large number of competitors in the industry are all competing for the same customers. Coffee chains (e.g. Costa, Starbucks) are all competing to be number one in the market and have similar corporate goals.

While product differentiation is limited, there is fierce differentiation by product range, brand and store ambience (e.g. seating). There are zero switching costs for customers, which promotes price wars.

Market growth is static, which promotes fierce fighting for market share, and there is saturation of competition due to the limited number of prime locations available for outlets. Smaller chains have to pay a premium for prime sites or settle for less desirable locations.

Threat of new entrants (Medium +)

  • Large capital requirements required to build chain of stores
  • Favourable locations are already occupied
  • Economies of scale in distribution and raw ingredients (lower per unit costs due to the experience curve)
  • Product and brand differentiation

Capital requirements for individual stores are low, however new entrants wishing to compete on a like basis with national store networks, distribution channels, brand equity development and advertising, face large capital requirements to gain market share. This is reflected in the large number of individual outlets compared with the small number of large, proven top specialty eateries.

The UK commercial property market is landlord-driven and controlled; premium locations in the UK are scarce and command high prices with most of the favourable locations within town centres, airports and train stations already being occupied by existing competitors.

Threat of substitutes (Medium +)

  • Large choice of alternatives with similar products e.g. energy drinks, cakes, biscuits, ice-cream, chocolate
  • No switching costs

Although a consumer can choose from multiple substitutes (e.g. desserts, pastries or drinks), speciality eateries compete based on convenience and opportunity. Most people buy from speciality eateries when travelling, shopping or meeting people. This is evidenced by the location of the eateries, which is concentrated around high footfall locations such as train stations, business districts and shopping centres. For a consumer this becomes a competitive choice rather than a substitute choice (e.g. do I buy a coffee from Starbucks or Costa).

Other substitutes come from full menu eateries such as restaurants and fast-food outlets with a smaller threat from supermarkets.

Bargaining power of suppliers (Low)

  • Vertically integrated businesses with only commoditised raw ingredients
  • Large number of suppliers to choose from and low switching costs

Bargaining power of buyers (Low)

  • Buyers are fragmented and numerous
  • Although there are no switching costs for the buyer the food and drink market is part of the fabric of society

What is Strategy?

Tuesday, January 25th, 2011

One lecture that has really stayed with me was given by our superb lecturer  Gianvito Lanzolla. He asked us a simple question, “What is strategy?”. It should have been a really easy question to answer but after much debate we did not have a coherent answer.

“Strategy is value creation and value appropriation it involves difficult trade-offs and needs to be reinforcing with the objective to create sustainable competitive advantage.”

Michael Porter also makes the important point operational effectiveness is not strategy. Operational effectiveness means performing similar activities better than your rivals, where as strategy is performing different activities from your rivals or similar activities in different ways.

Value creation

Providing something that customers want and they are willing to pay more than it cost to produce.

Value capturing with unique positioning

Capturing value is about being different (ideally unique) and deliberately choosing a different set of activities so that customers cannot buy the same product elsewhere. For example Ryan Air offer low cost flights to out-of-town locations and does not fly long haul.

Porter argues that strategic position comes from three sources:

  1. Serving few needs of many customers (e.g. Evian only sell water nothing else)
  2. Serving broad needs of few customers (e.g. Northern Trust targeting only high-wealth clients)
  3. Serving broad needs of many customers in a narrow market (e.g. Carmike cinemas who operate in towns with population less than 200,000 people)

Difficult decisions and trade-offs

Resources are always limited so you must make difficult decision and trade-off when you develop your strategy. For example Southwest airlines could choose to serve meals or it could not but it cannot do both.

Reinforcing choices and strategic fit

You need to develop your strategy so that elements of the business model “reinforce” each other or “fit” well. Elements fit well if the value of each element is increased by the presence of the other, an example might be Border’s decision to sell a wide range of books and their decision to invest in cutting-edge inventory tracking software.

Southwest Airlines Strategic Fit (click to enlarge)

How do you describe your strategy?

A very simple but powerful tool to describe your strategy is who, what, how.

Who is the customer (and who is not)
What is the value proposition (and what is not offered)
How do we deliver it (and how do we not deliver it)

Final thought

Competitive advantage erodes over time and must be renewed, once you have achieved success you must start looking forward to your next renewal.

Links

If you want to see Gianvito in action here are a couple of videos:

The Different Levels of Strategy

Thursday, January 20th, 2011

Not all strategies are created equal and when you are working on your company strategy you need to remember the level you are planning at.

Institutional strategy

Focusing on the legal and regulatory requirements of the business.

  • Maintaining and renewing the licence to operate

Corporate strategy

Concerned with the selection of businesses in which the company should compete and resource allocation.

  • Choosing which businesses to be in
  • How to allocate resources among existing businesses

Business strategy

Achieving sustainable competitive advantage in single industry

  • Business positioning
  • Influencing the nature of competition

Functional strategy

The strategic issues at the functional level are related to business processes and the value chain.

  • Functional departments (e.g. operations, HR etc) creating actions that supporting and aligning to business strategy

Analysing strategic forces that shape industries with PEST

Wednesday, January 12th, 2011

What is a PEST analysis?

For those of you, like me, who find strategy fascinating you may want to analyse the macro factors affecting your industry. While industry tools like five forces are static PEST can add a more dynamic element to your analysis. PEST stands for political, economic, social and technological analysis and is a framework to analyse the macro-environmental factors in strategy. A full description is on Wikipedia.

The real skill is knowing how to relate your PEST analysis back to your industry and how it will affect the root causes of profitability.

PEST analysis for Krispy Kreme

As you have probably guessed by now Krispy Kreme is the focus of my strategy coursework so expect more examples from them in the future (mmm I am hungry now!). As ever it is easier to see an example rather than writing endless theory, so below is an analysis I wrote recently for Krispy Kreme.

Political

Political factors on the specialist eateries industry are few and consist mainly of minimum wage changes and employment law changes. As Krispy Kreme train their staff, and require little prior experience or education they pay employees minimum wage or slightly above. As such they are affected by minimum wage increases. Other political factors have been the government action to reduce obesity, however it is very unlikely that government will legislate against high fat and unhealthy foods.

Economic

The continued economic downturn has meant tightened consumer spending and as Krispy Kreme is a non-essential food item this may pressure sales. Inflation is above the Bank of England target and there is upward pressure on long-term interest rates as shown by the UK treasury yield curve. An increase in interest rates will increase the cost of capital and mean more expensive borrowing for Krispy Kreme at a time that they need to expand to compete with their rivals.

Social

Evidence points towards a trend that UK consumers are becoming more aware about the ingredients in their food, e.g. boycotting trans fats foods, battery farmed poultry, mass farmed tuna. In 2008 this motivated Krispy Kreme to remove trans fats from their products. Low carb diet trends (such as the Atkin’s diet) can also have an effect on purchasing.

Going out to eat and drink is a social habit that is unlikely to change in the near future, but consumers can change their habits from eating doughnuts to another sweet-based food such as ice-cream or pastries. A social shift to eating full course meals instead of speciality items such as doughnuts or bagels would have an affect but this is unlikely to happen in the near term.

Culturally people in the UK do not have cult following for food brands like the USA. This can affect the advertising spend for companies as they need to spend more money to convince consumers to stay loyal.
It is questionable that customers in the UK would visit out of town stores to buy doughnuts, as the retail environment in the UK is more pedestrian driven as opposed to the USA which is dominated by cars and drive-through.

Technological

Due to the nature of purchasing and preparing foods, few technological trends influence the industry. However technology can be used to a improve efficiency, production, distribution, and monitor the commodity market changes in real time. Some commentators argued that ecommerce would mean people are less likely to visit physical stores. However the nature of speciality eateries is that they are convenience foods and require strong physical presence in order to capitalise on the impulse food purchase.

Environmental

Fluctuations in commodity prices will affect also affect margins as in 2009 when the price of wheat and soybean oil (key ingredients of doughnuts) reached record highs.